Difference between revisions of "Press:RT-PCR test"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Added the press section) |
(formatting) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
=== Variants and synonyms === | === Variants and synonyms === | ||
PCR test | |||
* PCR test | |||
===Examples=== | ===Examples=== | ||
| Line 18: | Line 16: | ||
===Keyness=== | ===Keyness=== | ||
* PCR test: > 1000 | * PCR test: >1000 | ||
===Note=== | ===Note=== | ||
There are no occurrences of RT-PCR test in the press corpus. | There are no occurrences of "RT-PCR test" in the press corpus. | ||
Latest revision as of 20:01, 7 March 2022
Press
Variants and synonyms
- PCR test
Examples
There have long been fears that "false negatives" in the rapid tests, which are less accurate than traditional PCR tests, could lead to outbreaks but documented cases are rare.
Collocations
- negative PCR test
- take a PCR test
Keyness
- PCR test: >1000
Note
There are no occurrences of "RT-PCR test" in the press corpus.